Legal Opinion

Dow v. River Farms Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1952No. Civ. 15009PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff, Maxine B. Dow, is the widow of Edgar Laurence Dow, and the administratrix of his estate. In her representative capacity, on December 6, 1949, she brought this action against the River Farms Company of California to recover from it the sum of $50,000, alleging that the corporation had promised and agreed but failed to pay that sum to her husband. The corporation admitted that it had offered to pay Dow $50,000, but averred in its answer that Dow rejected the offer, that the cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations, and that there was no consideration for the promise.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Marnon v. Vaughan Motor Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Carrington v. SmithersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Hoge v. Lava Cap Gold Mining Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. American Foundry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  3. Meyer v. Glenmoor Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Jara v. Suprema Meats, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API