Legal Opinion

Bruggemeyer v. Zimmerman

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1931No. Docket No. 195PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, J., pro tem.

Petitioner and decedent intermarried in Chicago, Illinois, on the eighth day of February, 1912. He had known decedent and lived in her family a greater portion of the time for more than thirty-three years prior to the marriage. They took up their residence in Cali fomia on November 1, 1923, and continued to reside in this state until the death of the decedent, which occurred on August 6, 1928. The bulk of the estate in question was accumulated in Illinois. About $20,000 cash in fees was received by petitioner while he was in California, for legal work that he had…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Cavanaugh v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Estate of ArmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. In Re the Estate of FreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Estate of ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Rozan v. RozanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Veit v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API