Legal Opinion

Kraushar v. Cummins Construction Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 9, 1942No. [No. 29, January Term, 1942.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Baltimore City Court, sitting without a jury, affirming the decision of the State Industrial Accident Commission disallowing the appellant compensation for the loss of an eye as provided by Article 101, Section 48, Code, 1989, and awarding appellant twenty-five weeks compensation for disfigurement. The appellant appeals for the purpose of reversing the decision of the State Industrial Accident Commission and the Baltimore City Court and seeks to obtain 100 weeks compensation provided in Article 101, Section 48, Code, 1939, supra, for loss of an eye.

The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Purchase v. Grand Rapids Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Leach v. Grangeville Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Liimatta v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Lisowsky v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Haas v. Globe Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Paul v. Glidden Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyard, Inc. v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Iacone v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  5. FLORIDA GAME & FRESH WATER FISH COM'N v. DriggersSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API