Legal Opinion

In Re Chase

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

In Buckner v. Finley, 2 Peters, 586, 7 Law Ed., 528, it is said: “For all national purposes embraced by the Federal Constitution, the states and the citizens thereof are one, united under the same sovereign authority, and governed by the same laws. In other respects the states are necessarily foreign to and independent of each other. Their constitutions and forms of government being, although republican, altogether different, as are their laws and institutions.” Although forming a confederated government the states retain, their individual sovereign-ties, and without special constitutional or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Mills v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  4. The ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellison v. HunsingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Cox v. RoachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Atlantic Coast Conference v. University of MarylandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Hughes v. FetterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. In Re OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API