Legal Opinion

Talley v. . Murchison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlarksoN, J.

Tbis is an action for partition. In Barber v. Barber, 195 N. C., 711 (712-13), it is said: “A tenant in common is entitled as a matter of right to partition of the land held in common, to the end that he may have and enjoy his share therein in severalty. Foster v. Williams, 182 N. C., 632; Haddock v. Stocks, 167 N. C., 70; Holmes v. Holmes, 55 N. C., 334. Whether or not, in a proceeding instituted under C. S., 3215, for partition of land, held by two or more persons as tenants in common, between or among such persons, there shall be an actual partition, or a sale for partition, as authorized…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alexander v. . GibbonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Taylor v. . CarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Foster v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Ledbetter v. . PinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Huneycutt v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seawell v. SeawellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Brown v. BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Johnson v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Hyman v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Moore v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API