Legal Opinion
Monaco v. Turbomotive, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 5, 2002No. AC 20974PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The plaintiff, William Monaco, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Turbomotive, Inc., and H.R. Solutions, Inc. (HRS), rendered after a hearing in damages following the entry of a default against the defendants for failure to comply with the court’s order regarding *62discovery. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that his claim was barred by General Statutes § 31-130 (i).1 We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are necessary for our resolution of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Giaimo v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- DeBlasio v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Todd v. GlinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Barrese v. DeFillippoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weber v. U.S. Sterling Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Urbanowicz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Bank of New York v. National FundingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. PaganoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.