Legal Opinion

Todd v. Glines

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 1, 1991No. 14086PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

In this personal injury action, the sole issue on the plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment of the trial court, after a jury trial, is whether the trial court improperly denied the plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial based upon a claim of an inadequate verdict. On the cross appeal of the defendants, Brett Glines, Arthur Glines and Tnais Glines,the sole issue is whether the trial court properly ordered, pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1987) § 52-225d (b) (3),1 an award of attorney’s fees to the *3plaintiff absent a specific request for such fees.2 Pursuant to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rowe v. GodouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Oakes v. New England Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Esaw v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Stewart v. Tunxis Service CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Spitzer v. Haims & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API