A.C. & S. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CRÁIG, President Judge.
Employer A.C. and S. and The PMA Group, employer’s insurer (employer) appeal an order of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirming a decision of a referee directing the claimant, Michael Dubil, to pay the employer $61,829.23, from a third-party award the claimant obtained, to satisfy the employer’s subrogation lien for worker’s compensation benefits paid to the claimant.
The questions the employer raises in this appeal are: (1) whether the referee erred by calculating the employer’s subrogation lien based upon attorney’s fees of 40% of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Merendino v. FMC Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kidd-Parker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Deak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Good Tire Service v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Good Tire Service v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- J. Marshall v. WCAB (Easton Coach Co. & Hartford Fire Ins. Co.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019