Legal Opinion

A.C. & S. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1992No. 172 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRÁIG, President Judge.

Employer A.C. and S. and The PMA Group, employer’s insurer (employer) appeal an order of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirming a decision of a referee directing the claimant, Michael Dubil, to pay the employer $61,829.23, from a third-party award the claimant obtained, to satisfy the employer’s subrogation lien for worker’s compensation benefits paid to the claimant.

The questions the employer raises in this appeal are: (1) whether the referee erred by calculating the employer’s subrogation lien based upon attorney’s fees of 40% of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. Merendino v. FMC Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  3. Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kidd-Parker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Deak v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Good Tire Service v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Good Tire Service v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. J. Marshall v. WCAB (Easton Coach Co. & Hartford Fire Ins. Co.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API