Legal Opinion
United States v. Sandifer
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 4, 1935No. 7368PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The suit was on a war risk insurance contract. Appellant seeks a reversal on one ground, that plaintiff did not prove total and permanent disability occurring before the lapse of his policy, and the court erred in not instructing the jury so. _
Here appellant, conceding that plaintiff did show that he has had active tuberculosis at times totally, and at times partially, disabling him, insists that plaintiff failed to show that the disablement- it caused is now, or was ever, total and permanent, and particularly that he failed to show that it so existed when the policy…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Falbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Wise v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. RentfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. CrumeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. PrimiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Galloway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. SpruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.