Legal Opinion

Hamilton Cnty. Emergency Commc'ns v. Level 3 Commc'ns

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 9, 2021No. 20-5304Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 21a0084n.06 No. 20-5304 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED HAMILTON COUNTY EMERGENCY Feb 09, 2021 COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT, et al., ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE ) THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT v. ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN ) DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, ) OPINION ) Defendant-Appellee. ) ) BEFORE: DAUGHTREY, NALBANDIAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judge. Like every state, Tennessee uses 911 as the phone number people call when they need emergency…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API