Legal Opinion
Ward v. Franklin Equipment Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 5, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 42-70-NPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KELLAM, District Judge.
The plaintiff seeks damages for loss by fire of a “Franklin Logger” manufactured by the defendant, which the plaintiff alleges was defective. The defendant moves the Court to add as a party plaintiff the Employers Mutual Fire Insurance Company who paid the plaintiff, as his insurer, for the damage to the logger, and who by virtue of subrogation has an interest in the subject matter of this action. Defendant supports this claim with an affidavit of an official of its company.
Rule 17(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provides, “Every action shall be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hall & Long v. Railroad Cos.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Aetna Life Insurance v. MosesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Glenn v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Company v. Harry L. Riggs, Jr. Mabel v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Truckweld Equipment Co. v. Swenson Trucking & Excavating, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Public Service Company of Oklahoma, a Domestic Corporation v. Black & Veatch, Consulting Engineers, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Lipari v. Niagara Machine & Tool WorksDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Blacks v. Mosley Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.