Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Bowen

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 1, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-2556-YPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

The Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) has moved to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the alternative, the Secretary moves to dismiss on the grounds that the plaintiffs’ claims have become moot. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is denied on both grounds.

I. Introduction

Some background is necessary before proceeding to the interesting clash of views over jurisdiction and mootness presented by the parties.

This suit was filed on behalf of a class on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,265 Fred Zeidman and Steven Youngelson v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Gaynell McCuin v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Abbey v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. McNeill v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Banks v. Secretary Of Indiana Family And Social Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Hermida v. ArchstoneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  5. Furtick v. Medford Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API