Legal Opinion

Russell v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 4, 1969No. 1 CA-IC 176PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

The basic question presented to this Court is whether there can be a finding of permanent physical injury of a non-schedule classification where the doctors are unable to fix a percentage of physical functional disability.

On 3 February, 1964, the petitioner was engaged in the performance of his official duties as a police officer of the City of Tucson. He was injured under circumstances indicating a third party liability for the injuries. Reports were made to The Industrial Commission which assumed jurisdiction. The petitioner exercised election number 2, that is to say, he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Salmi v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. Laird v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Vidal v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. McDaniel v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Noblitt v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Estrada v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Smith v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Smith v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Sordia v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API