Legal Opinion

Smith v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 2, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1309Published

1Opinion of the Court

26 Ariz. App. 297 (1976)

547 P.2d 1097

Henry D. SMITH, Sr., Petitioner,

v.

The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, City of Tucson, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.

No. 1 CA-IC 1309.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

March 30, 1976.

Rehearing Denied May 6, 1976.

Review Granted June 2, 1976.

David Eppstein & Tretschok by Dale D. Tretschok, Tucson, for petitioner.

Gregory L. Folger, Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Ariz., Phoenix, for respondent.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel, State Compensation Fund, by George B. Morse, Tucson, for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Midland-Ross Corporation v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Adams v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Smith v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Mahan v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Strong v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API