Legal Opinion

Morton v. Samuels

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 7, 1954No. 12678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is a suit upon a promissory note executed by Morton and payable to the order *491of Samuels. The salient facts of the con-tro-versy are succinctly stated in the finding^ of fact of the trial judge, from which the following statement is taken.

Joe Villareal was indebted to appellee, Thomas Samuels, and his partner, Oscar Bruni, in the sum of $2,100, which was evidenced by a past due note. On April 3, 1950, Villareal was adjudicated a bankrupt, in accordance with a petition filed August 13, 1949. Also, on that date the appellant, at the request of Villareal, signed a note for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ricketts v. ScothornNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Anderson v. LaddTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Greenwood Leflore Hospital Comm. v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Gauss-Langenberg Hat Co. v. AlleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Kiess v. BaldwinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grigson v. Creative Artists Agency, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. Grigson v. Creative Artists Agency, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Morton v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API