Morton v. Samuels
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
NORVELL, Justice.
This is a suit upon a promissory note executed by Morton and payable to the order *491of Samuels. The salient facts of the con-tro-versy are succinctly stated in the finding^ of fact of the trial judge, from which the following statement is taken.
Joe Villareal was indebted to appellee, Thomas Samuels, and his partner, Oscar Bruni, in the sum of $2,100, which was evidenced by a past due note. On April 3, 1950, Villareal was adjudicated a bankrupt, in accordance with a petition filed August 13, 1949. Also, on that date the appellant, at the request of Villareal, signed a note for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ricketts v. ScothornNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Anderson v. LaddTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Greenwood Leflore Hospital Comm. v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- Gauss-Langenberg Hat Co. v. AlleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Kiess v. BaldwinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grigson v. Creative Artists Agency, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Grigson v. Creative Artists Agency, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Morton v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954