Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grigson v. Creative Artists Agency, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 24, 2000No. 98-51016Published

1DissentDennis, Circuit Judge

“[NJearly anything can be called estop-pel. When a lawyer or a judge does not know what other name to give for his decision to decide a case in a certain' way, he says there is an estoppel.” 1 The trouble with that kind of use. of the estoppel label by the majority in this case making circuit precedent is that it will seriously hinder this court in upholding the basic principle that a person has a right to a court’s decision about the merits of a dispute unless he has agreed to submit it to arbitration. Because the majority decision conflicts with the Supreme Court’s recent emphatic…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API