Legal Opinion
City of Augusta v. Angelo
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 30, 1956No. 5-836PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. Seaborn Holt, Associate Justice.
This is a suit by appellee, Angelo, to recover alleged salary due him, as City Marshal, for Augusta, Arkansas, a city of the second class. The parties have stipulated that:
“Ordinance No. 232, referred to in plaintiff’s complaint was duly passed and published as required by law at the regular October, 1952, meeting of the City Council of said city and by its provisions did not take effect until January 1st, 1953.
“Ordinance No. 231, referred to in plaintiff’s complaint, was duly passed and published as required by law at the regular September, 1952, meeting of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thomas v. SittonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- McGill v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- City of Berryville v. BinamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crain v. City of Mountain HomeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Crain v. City of Mountain Home, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- City of Greenbrier v. CottonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Clark v. MahanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- City of Cabot v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.