Legal Opinion

Kadlec v. Dorsey

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 24, 2009No. 2 CA-CV 2009-0053PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Judge.

¶ 1 In this action to enforce an easement, appellants Daniel and Sherri Dorsey appeal from the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Paul and Rachel Kadlec and Duane and Brenda Howell (collectively, Kadlec), and its denial of the Dorseys’ motion for partial summary judgment. The Dorseys argue the court erred in finding that an easement for a roadway running across their property had been dedicated to public use. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural Background

¶ 2 We view the facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bed Mart, Inc. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Evans v. BlankenshipArizona Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Garvey v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Hunt v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Lowe v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kadlec v. DorseyArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  2. City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Kadlec v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API