Legal Opinion
Kadlec v. Dorsey
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 24, 2009No. 2 CA-CV 2009-0053Published
1Opinion of the Court
223 P.3d 674 (2009)
Paul KADLEC and Rachel Kadlec, husband and wife; Duane Howell and Brenda Howell, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Appellees,
v.
Daniel DORSEY and Sherri Dorsey, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellants.
No. 2 CA-CV 2009-0053.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.
December 24, 2009.
Vernon E. Peltz, Tucson, Attorney for Plaintiffs/Appellees Howell.
Bradley G.A. Cloud, Tucson, Attorney for Plaintiffs/Appellees Kadlec.
Hinderaker & Rauh, PLC By Adam Weisman, Tucson, Attorneys for Defendants/Appellants.
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Judge.
¶ 1 In this action to enforce an easement,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Falco Lime, Inc. v. Mayor & Aldermen of City of VicksburgMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Barrett v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Allied American Inv. Co. v. PettitArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Phoenix v. Landrum & Mills Realty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Bed Mart, Inc. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.