Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 28, 1991No. 89-2767 CR; CA A64448PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted on his plea of guilty to theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. He challenges the part of his sentence relating to the amount of restitution imposed and the joint and several nature of his liability for that amount. The state concedes that the record provides insufficient data from which to determine the proper amount of restitution, but it argues that joint and several liability is proper.

We affirm the decision without deciding either issue. Defendant pled guilty. His right to appeal is provided by ORS 138.050, which limits the issues that we may review to whether…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API