Grant Prideco, Inc. v. Empeiria Conner L.L.C.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Martha Hill Jamison, Justice
The parties to this appeal dispute the meaning of a contractual indemnity provision. The trial judge granted summary judgment agreeing with appellees’ interpretation. We agree with appellants’ interpretation and, therefore, reverse. Concluding, however, that appellants have not established as a matter of law that they are entitled to indemnification, we remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Background
Empeiria Conner L.L.C., Empeiria Conner II L.L.C., Aubrey Conner, Legg Mason SBIC Mezzanine Fund, L.P., AEA Mezzanine Fund, L.P., AEA…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. MayesTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- M.D. Anderson Hospital & Tumor Institute v. WillrichTexas Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fairfield Industries, Inc. v. EP Energy E&P Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- City of Galena Park v. Barry PonderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- HDSA Westfield Lake, LLC v. Harris County Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Classic C Homes, Inc. D/B/A Classic Century Homes, Classic Century Homes, Ltd., and Classic Century, Inc. v. Homeowners Management Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A Home of Texas, and Warranty Underwriters Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2015
- Joseph Abuzaid v. Anani, LLC, Big D Concrete, Inc., Muamar Anani and Hanadi Anani, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.