Kauffeld v. G. F. Pfund & Sons
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
The judgment under review' herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court; except that the Supreme Court made an error In holding that the deceased’s employment necessitated his entering the defendant’s smoke-house. The Court of Common Pleas, whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed, held that he did not enter the smoke-house. And the rule is that the Supreme Court may not review the facts as found by the Common Pleas in these eases when there is any evidence to support the lower court’s findings; and there was in this case.
On the whole case there…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Rubeo v. Arthur McMullen Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Alexander Orr, Jr., Inc. v. Florida Industrial Comm.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Essbee Amusement Corp. v. GreenhausSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Ciocca v. National Sugar Refining Co. of N.J.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Azarowicz v. Metropolitan Beef Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.