Legal Opinion
Teigen Construction, Inc. v. Pavement Specialists, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1978No. 12041PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
This action arose between the parties to a subcontract for spall work on 1-29, which subcontract was entered into between Pavement Specialists, Inc. (PSI), the prime contractor under a state contract, and Teigen Construction, Inc. (Teigen). Teigen commenced suit for the payment of money claimed due and PSI counterclaimed for damages for failure to fulfill the contract. A trial to the court resulted in a judgment in favor of Teigen on its complaint and against PSI on its counterclaim. PSI appeals. We concur in the result, but for different reasons.1
The prime contract was for a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Drier v. Perfection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Shader Contractors, Inc. And Citizens National Bank of Orlando, Assignee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Limmer v. WestegaardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Skjoldal v. MyrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Williams v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PennsylvaniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- North River Insurance Co. v. Golden Rule Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Famous Brands, Inc. v. David Sherman CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Ahlers Building Supply, Inc. v. LarsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- McCollam v. LittauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.