Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. Tristar Industries, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 5, 1985No. CV83-0930; CA A31068PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
Reversed on appeal and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion; affirmed on cross-appeal.
*33GILLETTE, P. J.
This is a garnishment proceeding. Appellant Clarkson Company (Clarkson) claims ownership of a debt garnished by plaintiff. The question on appeal is whether the debt is owed to defendant Tristar Industries, Ltd. (Tristar), a Canadian corporation now in receivership, making it subject to plaintiffs garnishment, or to Clarkson, a Canadian corporation appointed by the Supreme Court of British Columbia as receiver-manager of Tristar. We hold that the debt is owed to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Matter of Marriage of Red FoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Sterrett v. Stoddard Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. LynchOregon Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kotera v. Daioh International U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Novich v. McCleanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Cerner Middle East Limited v. Icapital, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019