Legal Opinion

Novich v. McClean

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 31, 2001No. 97 CV 0529 ST; CA A106736PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment that dismissed their case on the grounds that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over it and that the court was an inconvenient forum to try it. We reverse.

The dispute arises from defendant’s alleged breach of a real estate contract. In March 1990, defendant and a colleague, Jorge Suarez, agreed to sell plaintiffs a unit in a condominium complex, Quinta Mirage, that defendant and Suarez were developing near Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. The land on which Quinta Mirage eventually was built is located within 50 kilometers of the ocean. Consequently, the land is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Brady v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Wong v. Tenneco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kotera v. Daioh International U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Cron v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Black v. ArizalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Maricich v. LacossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. PNC Multifamily Capital Institutional Fund XXXIV Ltd. Partnership v. AOH-Regent Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API