Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Tucker v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 29, 2011No. A09-666Published

1ConcurrencePage, Justice

Although I join in the reasoning and analysis of the court’s opinion authored by Justice Stras as it relates to the inapplicability of the aggravating factor of particular cruelty to this case, I write separately because I believe Tucker’s upward departure fails for a more fundamental reason: Tucker’s failure to aid Garley constituted an uncharged offense and thus is an invalid ground for any upward departure.

Under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines, a district court may depart from the presumptive sentence only by “disclos[ing] in writing or on the record the particular substantial and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. State v. OttSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API