Jackson v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Criminal law. Indictment. Continuance. Evidence. Practice. Charge of court. Before Judge Roberts. Wilcox superior court. March adjourned term, 1891. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, Justice.
1. In preparing the indictment the names of three persons, John Jackson, Sam Curby and Ella Littlejohn, were originally written therein as the accused; but it would seem that before sending it to the grand jury the solicitor-general had erased the names of the two latter, leaving that of Jackson as the only person accused oi the crime. A demurrer to the indictment complained that the personal pronouns “ they, their and them” appeared throughout the indictment as referring to the party indicted, and that nowhere did the singular pronouns “ he, his and him” appear as referring…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Futch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Bland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Berry v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Reliford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.