Legal Opinion
Tindall Corp. v. Mondelez International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 29, 2017No. 14 C 05196PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge
This case illustrates that if a company wants to make sure that it has a real deal with another company—especially a multimillion dollar deal—put it in writing.1 Not just emails, but a formal, written agreement. Tindall Corporation brought this lawsuit against food-and-beverage conglomerate Mondelez International, alleging breach of contract and promissory estop-pel. R. 14, Am. Compl.2 Tindall claims that Mondelez awarded it a multi-million dollar contract to engineer, fabricate, and deliver precast concrete…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cindy M. Johnson, not individually, but as chapter 7 trustee v. Amerbank, LLC n/k/a Dolare, LLC and Miles Technology Solutions, LLC n/k/a Inventous, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Kessebohmer Retail Merchandising Inc. v. Pete's Fresh Market 4700 CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Maroon Society, Inc. v. Unison Consulting, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company v. The Cincinnati Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020