Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Focks Drilling & Manufacturing Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1936No. 32,815PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action to quiet title to 144 sections of land. Plaintiff prevailed, and six defendants and one who was not made a party to the action appeal.

The first question presented on this appeal is the validity of a judgment quieting title to all the real estate in this total tract of land, without making the legal or equitable owners of the land parties to the suit.- The reason for not naming them was stated in the petition as follows:

“Comes now Charles B. Taylor, as plaintiff, pleading in this his first cause of action for himself and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skinner v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Hoover v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Alber v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Holland Oil & Gas Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Becker v. RootheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. National Reserve Life Insurance v. KempSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Starke v. StarkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Preston v. Kaw Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. Cadwallader v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API