Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 26, 1921No. 23,538; No. 23,543PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Case No. 23,538. Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge. Case No. 23,543. Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

These actions are in mandamus. One comes to the court by appeal from an order of the district court of Montgomery county overruling a motion to quash the alternative writ, and an appeal in the same cause by the sheriff from an order against him. The other is an original proceeding by the state, on the relation of the county attorney, to compel the sheriff of Montgomery county to proceed with the collection of certain tax warrants placed in his hands by the county treasurer.

When the appeal in the first case was lodged in this court, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. State v. Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. NagleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Lockwood Co. v. LawrenceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Port Royal, Inc. v. ConboyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. In Re Fleet for Relief From a Tax GrievanceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Speed v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  5. State ex rel. Mellott v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API