Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. Ujack
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yavapai. Frank O. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This action involves the right of the appellee, the employee, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged *384to have been occasioned by the negligence of the appellant, the employer.
♦Among the defenses interposed, and it is the only one relied upon here, is that the rights of appellee are found in and measured by the compulsory compensation law, as contained in chapter 14, Laws of Arizona, First Special Session of 1912. It is conceded that appellee at the time of his injury was engaged in a hazardous occupation such as named in the compulsory compensation law,.and in the employers’…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sexton ex rel. Kin v. Newark District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Albanese v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1912
- Pensabene v. F. & J. Auditore Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Alabam's Freight Co. v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Taylor v. Hubbell Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. v. HubbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.