Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Hubbell Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. v. Hubbell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1951No. 12594PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed suit in Arizona’s superior court against Sanderson & Porter, a partnership, and its members for personal injuries. Diversity of citizenship existed, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332, and defendants removed the case to the federal court. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1441.
Following removal Tucson Gas, Electric Light and Power Company, plaintiff’s employer, and the Industrial Commission of Arizona, a public agency, intervened as defendants. From a judgment for plaintiff ■entered upon the jury’s verdict defendants and intervenors bring this appeal.
To expand its capacity to supply…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lockerty v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kyllo v. PanzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Nat Yanish v. Bruce G. Barber, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Ruth v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. PressleyArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Williams v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1953
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.