Legal Opinion

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 17, 1960No. C.D. 2157Published

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

These protests, consolidated at the trial, cover a large number of entries of fresh fish imported from Canada between July 1, 1953, and July 19, 1955, and entered at the port of Blaine, Wash., in the name of customs brokers, but for the account of Dahl Fish Company, Bellingham, Wash. The entries were liquidated on the basis of the entered weights; no protests were filed, but, with a few exceptions, hereinafter noted, the entries were reliquidated by the collector within 2 years after the date of the original liquidation, under section 521 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. F. Vitelli & Son v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Downing & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. United States v. Gage Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Draper & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. Gertzen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API