Legal Opinion
In Re Glacier Bay
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided September 28, 1990No. A88-115 CivilPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOLLAND, Chief Judge.
Phase I Motions and Motions to Dismiss
On August 23, 1990, the court heard oral argument on several related motions. Those motions were: plaintiffs’ Phase I motions regarding the scope of compensatory damage recovery; the Fund’s motion to dismiss claims of fish tenders and pro cessors; Trinidad, West, Hawker, Kee, Mathiasen’s, and GBTC’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss claims of tenders, fish buyers, fish spotters, fish processors, and other shoreside businesses; and the Fund’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs' prayer for attorney’s fees.
Plaintiffs’ combined Phase I…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kodiak Island Borough v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Immigrant Assistance Project Of The Los Angeles County Federation Of Labor v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Embotelladora Agral Regiomontana S.A. De C v. v. Sharp Capital, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
- Carr v. Tadin, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Tookalook Sales and Service v. McGahanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.