Legal Opinion
Carr v. Tadin, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 5, 2014No. Case No. 12-CV-3040 JLS (JMA)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND INCENTIVE AWARDS (ECF Nos., 43, 40)
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Jennell Carr and Phyllis Sierra’s (“Plaintiffs,” or, “Class Representatives”) Motion for an Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (ECF No. 43), as *974well as Defendant Tadin, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Statement of Non-Opposition (ECF No. 45), the sole objection to the settlement (Decl. of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allen v. Similasan Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Astorga v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- BUCHANNON v. ASSOCIATED CREDIT SERVICES INCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Blood v. Mercedez-Benz, USA, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.