Congregation B'Nai Jonah v. Kuriansky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Yesawich Jr., J.
In dispute are two subpoenas duces tecum issued by respondent Deputy Attorney-General for Medicaid Fraud Control (hereinafter respondent) in connection with an Albany County Grand Jury matter. One subpoena, dated August 17, 1990, is addressed to respondent Manhattan Savings Bank; it directs the bank to produce petitioner’s bank records for a four-year period. Supreme Court denied petitioner’s motion to quash this subpoena because of lack of standing and petitioner appeals.
The second subpoena duces tecum, dated October 10, 1990, requires petitioner, care of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Virag v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- In re Grand Jury Subpoenas for Local 17, 135, 257 & 608 of United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. ShapiroNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In re CappettaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Kosmider v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Norkin v. HoeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Oncor Communications v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Oncor Communications, Inc. v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.