Legal Opinion

Ames v. Goldfield Merger Mines Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 6, 1915No. 52PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Eucy V. Ames against the Goldfield Merger Mines Company, the Goldfield Deep Mines Company, J. Ross Clark, and C. A. Whittemore.

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

A temporary receiver was appointed in this case, o.n bill of complaint and affidavits of the complainant, for the Goldfield Merger Mines Company, and the cause set for hearing upon application for a continuance of the receivership by the court, and a show-cause order was issued to defendants. Amended bill of complaint was filed, and the matter came on for hearing before the court upon the amended bill, the answer of the defendants, and affidavits made in behalf of the several parties, on the 14th day of April, 1915. From the admitted facts and the affidavits it appears…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  2. Earle v. Seattle, L. S. & E. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McDougall v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. & C. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Tower Hill-Connellsville Coke Co. of West Virginia v. Piedmont Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  3. Jordan v. Austin Securities Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Twisp Mining & Smelting Co. v. Chelan Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Hunt v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API