Legal Opinion

Nozaki Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 3, 1956No. 59833; protests 230945-K, etc. (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

These cases, which have been consolidated, claim that the merchandise covered by the entries should have been assessed on the basis of the reappraised value, that the collector’s failure to so assess was due to clerical error, and that his refusal to reliquidate on that ground was improper. They are before this court on a motion of Government counsel to dismiss for untimeliness.

The facts as they appear of record are as follows: The involved merchandise, which consisted of Japanese canned clams, was the subject of appeals for reap-praisement. The court, in reappraisement, issued…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aris Gloves, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Pacific Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Abraham & Straus, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nozaki Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Nozaki Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API