Legal Opinion

Pacific Trading Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 2, 1952No. Reap. Dec. 8179; Entry No. 3380, etcPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

It is hereby stipulated as follows between counsel for plaintiffs and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, concerning the merchandise referred to herein:

1) That this stipulation is limited to so much of said merchandise as is described in the invoices as clams in 5-ounce cans or tins or clams in 8-ounce cans or tins, such items being marked “A” and initialed CEC by…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nozaki Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Nozaki Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Nozaki Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Nozaki Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. United Asia Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API