Legal Opinion
Schott v. Care Initiatives
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided October 15, 2009No. C 08-4068-MWBPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiff Donna Schott alleges that she was terminated by defendant Care Initiatives from her position as the administrator of a nursing home facility in Kingsley, Iowa, because of her age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 623 et seq., and the Iowa Civil Rights Act (ICRA), Iowa Code Ch. 216. Trial is set to begin in this matter on February 8, 2010.
On September 10, 2009, Care Initiatives filed the Motion For Summary Judgment…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barkhoff v. Bossard North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2010