Aumock v. Kilborn
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
September 3, 1930, appellants assigned and conveyed to respondent, for the benefit of their creditors, certain real estate and personal property. December 19, 1930, the parties entered into an agreement whereby respondent, in consideration of $12,000 paid to him by appellants to be applied toward the payment of their debts, reeonveyed and reassigned the property to them and agreed to account to them for the funds so coming into his hands. Prior to the commencement of the action respondent rendered to appellants two statements which he insists, and they deny, constitute such an accounting as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Williams v. DickensonSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Fox v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Schefski v. AnkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Johnson v. YoungIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Aumock v. KilbornIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lanning v. SpragueIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Cole v. KunzlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- Lanning v. SpragueIdaho Supreme Court · 1951