Legal Opinion

Lanning v. Sprague

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1951No. 7643Published

1Opinion of the Court

227 P.2d 347 (1951)

LANNING et ux.

v.

SPRAGUE.

No. 7643.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

February 2, 1951.

Gigray & Boyd, Caldwell, for appellant.

Dunlap & Dunlap, Caldwell, for respondents.

KEETON, Justice.

Plaintiffs, respondents here, brought this action to recover damages because of alleged deceit and misrepresentations of defendant, appellant, as to what constituted the boundary lines of Block 80, Mountain View Addition to Caldwell.

The parties will be referred to as they appear in the trial court. Respondents will be referred to as plaintiffs and appellant will be referred to as defendant.

Defendant, on…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Culbertson v. BlanchardTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lanning v. SpragueIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Rankin v. CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Watson v. MoldenIdaho Supreme Court · 1905

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API