C & J Leasing II Ltd. Partnership v. Swanson
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This replevin action involves the competing interests of two innocent parties who have been equally harmed by the dishonesty of a farm implement dealer. The question is whether pertinent provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code are meant to favor the buyer of goods in the ordinary course of business or a financier holding a prior security interest in those same goods. The district court ruled in favor of the secured creditor and that determination was upheld by the court of appeals. We granted the buyer’s petition for further review and now vacate the court of appeals…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Shawmut Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Potter v. OsterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Adams v. City National Bank &Trust Co. of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. KeilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Executive Financial Services, Inc. v. PagelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- C & J Vantage Leasing Co., Assignor to Frontier Leasing Corp., Assignee v. Thomas Wolfe D/B/A Lake Macbride Golf Course and Thomas Wolfe, IndividuallySupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- In Re HarnishUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
- Fin-Ag, Inc. v. Cimpl's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Schultz v. Bank of the West, C.B.C.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.