Legal Opinion

Carson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1951No. 32464Published

1Opinion of the CourtStewabt, J.

The issue in the present case is whether the insured died as the direct result, independently of all other causes, of bodily injuries caused solely by external, violent, and accidental means and not as the result of self-destruction.

Plaintiff relies upon three assigned errors as grounds for reversal of the judgment below.

*108The first assignment of error is directed to the refusal of the trial court to give the following special charge requested by plaintiff:

“Members of the jury: I charge you that if you find from the preponderance of the evidence that James Carson met his death by external and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. California State Life Insurance v. FuquaArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Kentucky Home Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Brunny v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Timberman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API