Legal Opinion

California State Life Insurance v. Fuqua

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1932No. Civil No. 3100PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Mary G. Fuqua and R. H. Fuqua, her husband, hereinafter^ called plarU'ffs, brought suit against Calif ornfe^Jjate Life ... .ranee, pany, a corporatiof^mereinafter «died defendant, to recover the sum of $5,000 jdAeged by plaintiffs to be due from defendant -on an insurance policy fey'it upon the life of one Francis Fuqua. The case wm tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for the full amount prayed for, and defendant has brought the matter before us for review.

Up to a certain point the parties are agreed as to the facts necessary for a determination of the case, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  2. In Re Estate of OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Beglin v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Security Benefit Assn. v. SmallArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Mendez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. New York Life Insurance v. McNeelyArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. INA Life Insurance Company v. BrundinAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Town of South Tucson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API