California State Life Insurance v. Fuqua
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
Mary G. Fuqua and R. H. Fuqua, her husband, hereinafter^ called plarU'ffs, brought suit against Calif ornfe^Jjate Life ... .ranee, pany, a corporatiof^mereinafter «died defendant, to recover the sum of $5,000 jdAeged by plaintiffs to be due from defendant -on an insurance policy fey'it upon the life of one Francis Fuqua. The case wm tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for the full amount prayed for, and defendant has brought the matter before us for review.
Up to a certain point the parties are agreed as to the facts necessary for a determination of the case, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dorsey v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- In Re Estate of OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Beglin v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Security Benefit Assn. v. SmallArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Mendez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- New York Life Insurance v. McNeelyArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- INA Life Insurance Company v. BrundinAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Town of South Tucson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.