Legal Opinion
G.A. Modefine S.A. v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 28, 1996No. 94 CIV 4646 (CBM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved for default judgment against defendants MXC, Inc. and Martin Mink for their failure to file timely, proper opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, the motion for default judgment is granted as against both defendants.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs, G.A. Modefine S.A., et al., manufacture men’s ties and other consumer items under the trademark “Giorgio Armani” and other related marks. (Second Amended Complaint (hereinafter, “Complaint”) at 14-16.) Defendant MXC, Inc. is alleged to be a New Jersey…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Paddington Partners v. Jean-Louis Bouchard, Herbert A. Denton, Econocom Finance Nv Econocom International N v. Jeffries & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Larsen v. JBC Legal Group, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Towers Financial Corp. Noteholders LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998