Baker v. . Harris
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
There is no cause assigned upon the record for a challenge to the array, and we consider the case, therefore, as a challenge to the polls. It was so treated in the court below.
Challenges of this sort lie under three principal divisions: (1) propterhonorem; (2) propter defectum; (3) propter affectum. Of the last, under which lies our case, there are two sorts; the one working a principal challenge, the other to the favor. And the first question that presents itself for our consideration is whether the cause assigned be principal cause or cause for challenge to the favor only. For if it be of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sehorn v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1859
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Burke v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Butler v. Greensboro Fire & Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- State Highway Commission v. FryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969