Legal Opinion

Butler v. Greensboro Fire & Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 24, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The two general divisions of challenges are to the array and to the polls. At common law the office of selecting a jury was committed to the sheriff,, and his partiality, or “unindifferency,” was the usual ground on which the array was challenged. Under our practice a challenge to the array is generally allowed when partiality or misconduct of tbe summoning officer is brought to the attention of the court, or where in making out the jury list a mandatory statute is disregarded, or where some fatal irregularity is shown. 1 Thompson' on Trials, ch. 3, sec. 31; S. v. Murph, 60 N. C., 129; S. v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. . PottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. State v. Bohanon.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. State v. . BannerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. State v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  5. State v. . BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1836

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shinal, M., et ux, Aplts. v. Toms M.D., S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. State v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Wright v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Hardesty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. State v. . BuffkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API