Legal Opinion
In the Interest of R.M.
Court of Appeals of Iowa
Decided August 24, 1988No. 88-205PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HABHAB, Judge.
The two children in question (E.M. and R.M.) are boys born in March 1980 and August 1982. They are the youngest of four sons born to D.M. at the time she was married to R.M., Sr. R.M., Sr. denies pa ternity of the younger two children and has had little contact with them since the dissolution of his marriage to D.M. We parenthetically note that D.M. had two daughters prior to her marriage to R.M., Sr. and that her parental rights were terminated and her two daughters adopted by their maternal grandparents.
The family, prior to the birth of E.M. and R.M., has received repeated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In the Interest of DameronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Long v. LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- In the Interest of ChadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In the Interest of L.H.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- In the Interest of J.W.D.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- J.S. v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- In the Interest of D.E.D.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1991
- In the Interest of J.R.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.