Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D.E.D.

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided August 27, 1991No. 90-1398PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SACKETT, Judge.

This is an appeal from a trial court’s decision terminating the parental rights of three young children. The children have the same mother and three different fathers. The mother contends her parental rights should not have been terminated. We affirm on her appeal. The only father who appeals is the father of D.D., the middle child. We review de novo. Iowa R.App. P. 4. We reverse the order terminating his parental rights. We remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The two older children, a girl born in March 1984, and a boy born in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Alsager v. District Court of Polk Cty., IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1975
  5. In Re the Welfare of AschauerWashington Supreme Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re P.L.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. In the Interest of D.G.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2005
  3. In the Interest of R.K.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2002
  4. In The Interest Of P.l., Minor Child, O.l.-v., FatherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API